Boundaries and the future role of libraries (and of knowing)

Professor Gary Marchionini made a number of interesting remarks in his guest of honour talk at the biannual LIDA conference in Zadar. Marchionini made some remarks on the future role of libraries as institutions collecting people. By collecting people he referred to managing and helping to curate our personal data, information and cyber identity. As a part of this focus on people (instead of e.g. documents) Marchionini discussed a possible task of managing both positive and negative boundaries: by leveraging trust by clearly articulating boundaries and e.g. by being user-centred and enforcing policies simultaneously encouraging participation

Together with these observations of boundaries, from my perspective one of the most interesting of his remarks related to the role of libraries as helping people deal with their information gaps (and learning to fill these gaps) and various types of overloads: lifeload, workload, cognitive load and collaborative load. In my mind these thoughts resonate well with my own considerations about the boundaries of knowing and how these borders and limits are both helping and hindering us knowing things. Further, they provide a frame for communities to know things together, to reach consensus and shared understanding of different things. In the contemporary society these boundaries are changing fast and they become less physical and more social and technical. Overload and effective capability to collaborate with others, whether it would be collective talko work or more egoistic broadcastselfism, become key factors in how the the boundaries of knowing are shaped in the contemporary society. In this respect, I think Marchionini put rightly a lot of emphasis on the importance of dealing with collaborative load and the significance of the competence of doing things together.

Archaeology and Archaeological Information in the Digital Society shows how the digitization of archaeological information, tools and workflows, and their interplay with both old and new non-digital practices throughout the archaeological information process, affect the outcomes of archaeological work, and in the end, our general understanding of the human past.

Read more

COST-ARKWORK is a network funded by the COST scheme that brings together the multidisciplinary work of researchers of archaeological practices in the field of archaeological knowledge production and use. The aim of the network is to make a major push forward in the current state-of-the-art in knowing how archaeological knowledge is produced, how it is used and how to maximise its positive impact in the society.

Read more

CApturing Paradata for documenTing data creation and Use for the REsearch of the future (CAPTURE) investigates what information about the creation and use of research data that is paradata) is needed and how to capture enough of that information to make the data reusable in the future. 

Read more